Flammability of some companion species in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) forests

The high flammability of some companion species in Quercus suber forests, estimated in laboratory tests, could potentially generate an increase in fire vulnerability and in fire risk.

Context. Recurrent wildfire is one of the main causes of forest degradation, especially in the Mediterranean region. Increased fire frequency and severity due to global change could reduce the natural resilience of cork oak to wildfire in the future. Hence, it is important to evaluate the flammability of companion species in cork oak forests in the particularly dry bioclimatic conditions of North Africa.
Aims. This study aimed to assess and compare flammability parameters at laboratory scale among ten companion frequent species in cork oak forests.
Methods. Fuel samples were collected in a cork oak (Quercus suber L) forest in the southern part of the mountains of Tlemcen (Western Algeria). A series of flammability tests were carried out using a Mass Loss Calorimeter device (FTT ®). A cluster analysis to classify flammability of the selected species was conducted using the K-means algorithm.
Results. The results revealed differences in the four flammability parameters (ignitability, sustainability, combustibility and consumability), in both fresh and dried fine fuel samples from Quercus suber, Pinus halepensis, Quercus ilex, Quercus faginea, Erica arborea, Arbutus unedo, Pistacia lentiscus, Calicotome spinosa, Juniperus oxycedrus and Tetraclinis articulata. Application of the K-means clustering algorithm showed that C. spinosa, T. articulata, J. oxycedrus and P. halepensis are highly flammable because of their high combustibility and sustainability.
Conclusion. The findings identify species that could potentially increase the vulnerability of cork oak forests to forest fires.

Keywords

Fire risk, Fuel moisture content, Mass loss calorimeter, Mediterranean basin, Algeria

Publication

Dehane, B., Hernando, C., Guijarro, M. et al. Annals of Forest Science (2017) 74: 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0659-5

For the read-only version of the full text: http://rdcu.be/uKSp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.